SECTION 01Chi-Squared Variables
Example · Sub-Exponential but Not Sub-Gaussian
Let Z ∼ N(0, 1) and X = Z². Then X has a chi-squared distribution with one degree of freedom. For λ < 1/2,
The MGF is infinite for λ ≥ 1/2, so X is not sub-Gaussian. However, near zero,
This is the sub-exponential MGF bound with parameters (ν, α) = (2, 4).
Formulation · Concentration of a Chi-Squared Variable
Let Z₁, …, Zₙ be independent standard Gaussian variables. Their squared sum Y = ∑ₖ₌₁ⁿ Zₖ² has a chi-squared distribution with n degrees of freedom. By the independent-sum property, Y is sub-exponential with parameters (2√n, 4), and E[Y] = n. Therefore,
Concentration of chi-squared variables is useful for analyzing random projections.
SECTION 02Johnson–Lindenstrauss Embedding
Setting · Preserve Distances in Fewer Dimensions
Suppose we have N ≥ 2 distinct vectors u₁, …, uN in ℝᵈ. When d is large, storing and processing them can be expensive. We seek a map F: ℝᵈ → ℝᵐ, with m much smaller than d, that approximately preserves all pairwise distances.
For a tolerance δ ∈ (0, 1), the goal is
Formulation · A Gaussian Random Projection
Generate a matrix A ∈ ℝᵐˣᵈ with independent N(0, 1) entries and define
Claim · A Dimension Bound for Preserving All Pairwise Distances
For δ, ϵ ∈ (0, 1), if
then, with probability at least 1 − ϵ over A, the distance guarantee holds for every pair of data points.
Proof of the Embedding Claim
(1) Fix a nonzero u ∈ ℝᵈ. Let aₖ be row k of A. Since aₖ is a standard Gaussian vector, the variables ⟨aₖ, u⟩/‖u‖₂ are independent N(0, 1). Thus
Apply the chi-squared concentration bound:
(2) Apply this result to each difference uᵢ − uⱼ. There are distinct pairs. The union bound gives
(3) Since N(N − 1) ≤ N², it suffices to make N² exp(−mδ²/8) smaller than ϵ. Taking logs gives
The simpler condition m > (16/δ²) log(N/ϵ) is slightly stronger and therefore sufficient.