SECTION 01Properties of Sub-Gaussian Moments and MGFs
We introduce some additional properties of sub-Gaussian moments that will be useful later.
Claim · MGF Control and Moment Control Are Equivalent
Let X have mean zero. The following two conditions are equivalent:
(1) There is a σ > 0 such that
(2) There is a θ > 0 such that
Proof · MGF Control Implies Moment Control
Although differentiating the MGF at zero recovers moments, an inequality between functions does not imply the same inequality between their derivatives. We instead pass through tail probabilities.
The MGF bound gives the sub-Gaussian tail bound
Relate the moment to the tail using
Substitute the tail bound and integrate:
SECTION 02Gaussian Comparison
Claim · MGF, Gaussian Tail Comparison, and Moment Control Are Equivalent
Let X have mean zero. The following three conditions are equivalent:
(1) There is a σ > 0 such that
(2) There is a constant c ≥ 1 and a Gaussian variable Z ∼ N(0, τ²), with τ > 0, such that
(3) There is a θ > 0 such that
All three conditions characterize sub-Gaussianity. The parameters may change when passing between the conditions.
Proof · Gaussian Tail Comparison Implies Moment Control
Applying the same tail-integral identity gives
The constant c can be absorbed into the moment parameter by taking θ = τ√c.
SECTION 03Connecting the Two Moment Bounds
Sections 1 and 2 describe the same type of moment control, with different constants. For k ≥ 1, we have 2(k!)² ≤ (2k)!, so the bound from Section 1 gives
Taking θ = 2σ puts this bound in the Gaussian moment form used in Section 2. The parameters may differ, but both forms characterize sub-Gaussian moment growth.